# Temp Table Transformation Cardinality Estimates - 2

Continuing from the previous part - which was about the Temp Table Transformation and join cardinality estimates - using the same simple table setup here is a slight variation of the previously used query to demonstrate the potential impact on single table cardinality estimates:

`explain plan forwithcte as (select /* inline */ id from t1 twhere 1 = 1)select /*+           no_merge(a) no_merge(b)       */ * from cte a, cte bwhere a.id = b.idand a.id > 990 and b.id > 990;-- 11.2.0.x Plan with TEMP transformation--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Id  | Operation                  | Name                      | Rows  | Bytes |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT           |                           |  1000 | 26000 ||   1 |  TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION |                           |       |       ||   2 |   LOAD AS SELECT           | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D661C_275FD9 |       |       ||   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL       | T1                        |  1000 |  4000 ||*  4 |   HASH JOIN                |                           |  1000 | 26000 ||*  5 |    VIEW                    |                           |  1000 | 13000 ||   6 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL      | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D661C_275FD9 |  1000 |  4000 ||*  7 |    VIEW                    |                           |  1000 | 13000 ||   8 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL      | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D661C_275FD9 |  1000 |  4000 |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Predicate Information (identified by operation id):---------------------------------------------------    4 - access("A"."ID"="B"."ID")   5 - filter("A"."ID">990)   7 - filter("B"."ID">990)-- 11.2.0.x Plan with INLINE hint----------------------------------------------------| Id  | Operation           | Name | Rows  | Bytes |----------------------------------------------------|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |      |    10 |   260 ||*  1 |  HASH JOIN          |      |    10 |   260 ||   2 |   VIEW              |      |    10 |   130 ||*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1   |    10 |    40 ||   4 |   VIEW              |      |    10 |   130 ||*  5 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1   |    10 |    40 |----------------------------------------------------Predicate Information (identified by operation id):---------------------------------------------------    1 - access("A"."ID"="B"."ID")   3 - filter("ID">990)   5 - filter("ID">990)`

Again it's obvious that the Temp Table Transformation can have significant impact on the single table cardinality estimates.In particular:- Although the same filter is applied in both cases to the rowsources A and B, in case of the Temp Table Transformation it doesn't reduce the cardinality. So it's not uncommon to end up with significant cardinality overestimates in case the transformation gets used- For Exadata environments particularly bad is that the filter isn't pushed into the TABLE ACCESS FULL operator, but only applied in the VIEW operator above, which means that it can't be offloaded - all the data needs to be sent from the Storage Cells to the Compute Nodes and filtered there. Not a very efficient way to operate on ExadataThe behaviour is still the same in 12c.